Alienware Aurora R13

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics157% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAlienware Aurora R13  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0446JC
Memory19.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230913
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '24 at 21:35
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 6800-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700KF-$180
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 71.9
1-Core 196
2-Core 391
113% 220 Pts
4-Core 772
8-Core 1,386
130% 1,079 Pts
64-Core 2,206
136% 2,206 Pts
Poor: 107%
This bench: 108%
Great: 121%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6800-XT-$650
Dell(1028 3950) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 24.1.1
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
157% Outstanding
Lighting 182
Reflection 218
Parallax 392
148% 264 fps
MRender 351
Gravity 150
Splatting 283
214% 261 fps
Poor: 165%
This bench: 157%
Great: 178%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme PC801 SK hynix 1TB
208GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51003141 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,247
Write 2,965
Mixed 1,192
615% 2,802 MB/s
4K Read 59.7
4K Write 217
4K Mixed 82.8
312% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 1,235
DQ Write 962
DQ Mixed 1,092
819% 1,097 MB/s
Poor: 176% Great: 499%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown XKHFXM-MIA-A 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 4400 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
133% Outstanding
MC Read 54.2
MC Write 49.8
MC Mixed 49.9
147% 51.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.5
SC Write 46.2
SC Mixed 26.9
87% 30.5 GB/s
Latency 97.9
41% 97.9 ns
Poor: 133%
This bench: 133%
Great: 153%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 13: 0P 1R 1G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
13% 30% 23 186 15 100 34" 2560 1369 DELD12D DELL S3422DWG
Typical Aurora R13 Builds (Compare 898 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 214%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 251%
UFO

System: Alienware Aurora R13

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $1,159
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback