Arcelik-a.s. GNB-1589-B1-i5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemArcelik-a.s. GNB-1589-B1-i5  (all builds)
MotherboardARCELIK-A.S.
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '24 at 16:46
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Memory 83.1
1-Core 64
2-Core 131
57% 92.8 Pts
4-Core 190
8-Core 200
26% 195 Pts
64-Core 200
12% 200 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Quanta(152D 1107) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5171
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
1.89% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 3.3
Parallax 6.7
0% 3.37 fps
MRender 6.7
Gravity 5
Splatting 7.7
5% 6.47 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.89%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120 GB 120GB
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE3000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 28 61 60 72 73 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 345
Write 51.4
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 51.3
24% 114 MB/s
4K Read 14.2
4K Write 19.9
4K Mixed 15.1
51% 16.4 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 43
DQ Mixed 3.9
23% 55.8 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6MFR8A-PB 0420 AM1L16BC4R1-B1PS 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.7% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 15
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 14.1
38% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO42EC
Typical GNB-1589-B1-i5 Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Arcelik-a.s. GNB-1589-B1-i5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback