Asrock A320M-HDV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	14% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock A320M-HDV (all builds)
Memory	9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190803
Uptime	7.5 Days
Run Date	Feb 15 '24 at 07:12
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	70.5% Very good	Memory 68.5 1-Core 96.6 2-Core 196 67% 120 Pts	4-Core 389 8-Core 636 63% 512 Pts	64-Core 1,033 64% 1,033 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Gigabyte(1458 3767) 2GB CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 536.40 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	14% Very poor	Lighting 17 Reflection 18.2 Parallax 17.7 14% 17.6 fps	MRender 15.5 Gravity 19.2 Splatting 17.2 14% 17.3 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HUA723030ALA640 3TB-$37 11,382 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: MKAONS00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 97 86 95 99 107 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	63.5% Good	Read 128 Write 130 Mixed 74.5 SusWrite 92.6 78% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 178% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 63.5% Great: 87%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59 47,815 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 35GB free Firmware: JP2OA3GH SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 72 68 72 71 76 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	41.1% Average	Read 72.3 Write 52.9 Mixed 41 SusWrite 70.7 44% 59.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 41.1% Great: 74%
Asmt USB 3.0 Destop H 500GB 188 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 451GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 37 37 37 38 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	26.1% Poor	Read 53.4 Write 36.6 Mixed 25.8 SusWrite 37.3 28% 38.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 122% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 26.1% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMK8GX4M1A2400C16 CL16-16-16 D4-2400 16GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	75.6% Very good	MC Read 29.8 MC Write 26.9 MC Mixed 26 79% 27.6 GB/s	SC Read 18.5 SC Write 27.3 SC Mixed 21.7 64% 22.5 GB/s	Latency 106 38% 106 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 75.6% Great: 89%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	70	58	60	27"	1280 720	SPT0AD7 Sceptre F27

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A320M-HDV Builds (Compare 833 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV

CPU
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	163x
Ryzen 5 2400GAMD $135Bench 63%, 127,344 samples	85x
Ryzen 3 1200AMD $100Bench 57%, 83,528 samples	83x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	104x
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)AMDBench 10%, 85,536 samples	50x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	42x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	28x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	27x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $75Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	19x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	13x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 2x4GBUnknownBench 75%, 7,488 samples	13x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 96% - Outstanding

Total price: $236

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16