Gigabyte GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS Ultra

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics48.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive243% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS ULTRA
MotherboardGigabyte GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS Ultra  (all builds)
Memory26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211105
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 14 '24 at 20:46
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$399
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 94.1
1-Core 144
2-Core 290
97% 176 Pts
4-Core 572
8-Core 1,063
98% 818 Pts
64-Core 1,468
91% 1,468 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 100%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$288
Asus(1043 8698) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 551.23
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (59 fps cap detected)
48.2% Average
Lighting 59
Reflection 59
Parallax 59
48% 59 fps
MRender 59
Gravity 59
Splatting 59
48% 59 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
323GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 967 739 737 735 727 719 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
243% Outstanding
Read 2330
Write 1,957
Mixed 1,424
SusWrite 770
361% 1,620 MB/s
4K Read 53.4
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 70.8
227% 76.5 MB/s
DQ Read 785
DQ Write 639
DQ Mixed 688
522% 704 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 243%
Great: 355%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
266GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 458 473 476 476 354 281 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 472
Mixed 419
SusWrite 420
102% 452 MB/s
4K Read 37.3
4K Write 80.7
4K Mixed 49.5
163% 55.8 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 351
265% 355 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 112%
Great: 129%
WD easystore 25FB 8TB
6.5TB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 184 186 183 184 179 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Read 185
Write 191
Mixed 124
SusWrite 183
230% 171 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.1
210% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 3000 2OZ 04CB DDR4 3000 04CB DDR4 3000 2OZ 04CB DDR4 3000 32GB
3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
MC Read 35.1
MC Write 37.5
MC Mixed 27.7
96% 33.4 GB/s
SC Read 20.1
SC Write 40.8
SC Mixed 29.1
86% 30 GB/s
Latency 61.4
65% 61.4 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 26.9" 2560 1440 BNQ7F47 BenQ SW2700
Typical GA-Z390 AORUS ULTRA-CF Builds (Compare 7,783 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 150%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS Ultra - $172

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $1,223
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback