| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 47.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asrock X99 Extreme6 (all builds) |
| Memory | 13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20140821 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 14 '24 at 19:41 |
| Run Duration | 124 Seconds |
| Run User | CHE-User |
| Background CPU | 5% |
PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
|
76.9%
Very good
|
71% 124 Pts
|
61% 502 Pts
|
47% 759 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.29
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
47.3%
Average
|
47% 62.2 fps
|
48% 60.1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.3 12 6.1 5.4 5.5 8.4 MB/s
|
||||
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
496GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 172 173 170 169 173 MB/s
|
92.3%
Outstanding
|
99% 135 MB/s
|
170% 1.23 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C12 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
66.6%
Good
|
69% 24.2 GB/s
|
52% 18.2 GB/s
|
46% 86 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 0% | 0 | 64 | 51 | 60 | 24" | 1920 1080 | SAM0D92 S24D330 |
Typical X99 Extreme6 Builds (Compare 94 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock X99 Extreme6
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples | 72x |
| Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples | 15x |
| Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples | 3x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 13x |
| GTX 1080Nvidia $265Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 9x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 8x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 118% - Outstanding | Total price: $360 |