Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JB_X509JB

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	6.36% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	233% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	36GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 36GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

4 months ago, 1 month ago.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JB_X509JB (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X509JB
Memory	27.6 GB free of 36 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210812
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Feb 14 '24 at 18:51
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	LBN-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-1035G1 53,170 User benchmarks, average bench 51% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	61.4% Good	Memory 65.9 1-Core 112 2-Core 194 69% 124 Pts	4-Core 307 8-Core 444 47% 376 Pts	64-Core 428 26% 428 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 61.4% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia MX110 6,322 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Asus(1043 183F) 2GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.4633 Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	6.36% Terrible	Lighting 7.1 Reflection 9.7 Parallax 7.6 6% 8.13 fps	MRender 11.7 Gravity 8.2 Splatting 8.1 8% 9.33 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.36% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SKC3000S512G 512GB 2,843 User benchmarks, average bench 323% 321GB free (System drive) Firmware: EIFK31.6 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1482 791 709 671 481 487 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	233% Outstanding	Read 1,624 Write 2,084 Mixed 1,742 SusWrite 770 351% 1,555 MB/s	4K Read 55.6 4K Write 130 4K Mixed 81.7 258% 89 MB/s	DQ Read 1,059 DQ Write 754 DQ Mixed 904 676% 906 MB/s
Poor: 184% ↑ This bench: 233% Great: 451%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 912GB free Firmware: JU0C2J SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 135 135 126 119 103 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	75.5% Very good	Read 136 Write 142 Mixed 53.6 SusWrite 126 83% 114 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 6.4 4K Mixed 0.6 244% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 75.5% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD Transcend JM3200HSE-32G 35GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2667, 3200 MHz 4096, 32767 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	37.8% Below average	MC Read 14.4 MC Write 13.2 MC Mixed 11.4 37% 13 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 13.5 SC Mixed 11.7 37% 12.8 GB/s	Latency 122 33% 122 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 37.8% Great: 70%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	57	33	60	15.5"	1280 720	AUO61ED

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JB_X509JB Builds (Compare 381 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JB_X509JB

CPU
Core i5-1035G1IntelBench 51%, 53,170 samples	216x
Core i7-1065G7IntelBench 53%, 58,314 samples	109x
Core i3-1005G1IntelBench 44%, 22,960 samples	56x

GPU
UHD G1IntelBench 5%, 68,603 samples	183x
MX110NvidiaBench 6%, 6,322 samples	122x
Iris Plus G7IntelBench 9%, 52,498 samples	76x

SSD
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBBench 121%, 26,870 samples	47x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1202 512GBWDCBench 155%, 2,132 samples	32x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1202 256GBWDCBench 145%, 4,206 samples	23x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CTD Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 8GBSamsungBench 58%, 6,259 samples	146x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GBSamsungBench 60%, 54,777 samples	88x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples	54x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369