Default string

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics149% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardColorful BATTLE-AX B460M-D
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200612
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 14 '24 at 16:01
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User SAU-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400F-$98
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Memory 93.1
1-Core 119
2-Core 241
85% 151 Pts
4-Core 481
8-Core 700
74% 590 Pts
64-Core 822
51% 822 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.52
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
149% Outstanding
Lighting 222
Reflection 260
Parallax 194
181% 225 fps
MRender 191
Gravity 146
Splatting 130
124% 155 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 149%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar 250GB SSD 250GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.0.5
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,598
Write 1035
Mixed 857
257% 1,163 MB/s
4K Read 54.9
4K Write 153
4K Mixed 43.1
219% 83.5 MB/s
DQ Read 360
DQ Write 603
DQ Mixed 61.6
165% 341 MB/s
Poor: 98% Great: 209%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
113GB free
Firmware: 13057113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 49 105 107 106 106 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 136
Write 70.5
Mixed 73.3
SusWrite 87.1
68% 91.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
168% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL16G30C15U4W.M16FE1 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.7% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 14
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 15.8
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 7: 0P 0R 1G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
7% 6% 78 210 58 240 27" 1280 720 ACR072D XV273 X
Typical string Builds (Compare 14,724 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback