Asus X99-DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 154%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 143%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics199% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive220% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus X99-DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory24.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '24 at 10:41
Run Duration273 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5960X-$201
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
77.3% Very good
Memory 89.8
1-Core 91.2
2-Core 178
71% 120 Pts
4-Core 349
8-Core 619
58% 484 Pts
64-Core 960
59% 960 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
199% Outstanding
Lighting 284
Reflection 279
Parallax 319
231% 294 fps
MRender 347
Gravity 254
Splatting 189
207% 263 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 199%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
152GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 737 587 637 628 619 611 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
220% Outstanding
Read 2236
Write 2,003
Mixed 1661
SusWrite 636
365% 1634 MB/s
4K Read 52.1
4K Write 94.7
4K Mixed 64.9
212% 70.6 MB/s
DQ Read 670
DQ Write 471
DQ Mixed 572
427% 571 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 220%
Great: 340%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
3GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 477
Write 226
Mixed 275
72% 326 MB/s
4K Read 36.4
4K Write 70.1
4K Mixed 44.8
150% 50.4 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 283
DQ Mixed 247
207% 303 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 126%
Intel 520 Series 240GB-$139
131GB free
Firmware: 400i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 217 224 223 225 224 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Read 383
Write 278
Mixed 268
SusWrite 218
64% 287 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 70
4K Mixed 37.7
134% 46.5 MB/s
DQ Read 305
DQ Write 252
DQ Mixed 255
198% 271 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 95%
Intel 730 Series 480GB-$230
61GB free
Firmware: L2010420
SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 342 344 403 424 422 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Read 395
Write 461
Mixed 333
SusWrite 379
88% 392 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 69.5
4K Mixed 33.7
124% 44 MB/s
DQ Read 346
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 310
236% 320 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 110%
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
73GB free
Firmware: M6CR030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 327 322 323 123 50 75 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
49.5% Average
Read 478
Write 428
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 204
65% 293 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 32.1
4K Mixed 0.9
52% 18.5 MB/s
DQ Read 132
DQ Write 49.6
DQ Mixed 1
24% 61 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 100%
Intel 730 Series 480GB-$230
39GB free
Firmware: L2010420
SusWrite @10s intervals: 332 324 304 305 292 263 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Read 384
Write 402
Mixed 255
SusWrite 303
76% 336 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 69
4K Mixed 33.8
123% 43.7 MB/s
DQ Read 344
DQ Write 290
DQ Mixed 298
228% 311 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3000 C15 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
115% Outstanding
MC Read 49.9
MC Write 43.3
MC Mixed 42.6
129% 45.3 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 20.5
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 69
58% 69 ns
Poor: 96%
This bench: 115%
Great: 151%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 52 144 48.9" 1280 720 SAM0E5E C49HG9x
Typical X99-DELUXE Builds (Compare 1,928 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $652
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $98Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $205Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback