Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM_FX506HM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM_FX506HM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX506HM
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230303
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '24 at 09:39
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Memory 67
1-Core 158
2-Core 314
94% 180 Pts
4-Core 610
8-Core 1,010
99% 810 Pts
64-Core 1,338
83% 1,338 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GB
373GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,430
Write 1,547
Mixed 1,286
387% 1,754 MB/s
4K Read 79.9
4K Write 219
4K Mixed 103
368% 134 MB/s
DQ Read 450
DQ Write 874
DQ Mixed 414
385% 579 MB/s
Poor: 99% Great: 297%
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLW256HEHP-000L2 256GB
237GB free
Firmware: 4L1QCXB7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,935
Write 1,338
Mixed 954
311% 1,409 MB/s
4K Read 62.4
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 77.8
256% 85.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1372
DQ Write 967
DQ Mixed 998
792% 1,112 MB/s
Poor: 130% Great: 261%
Generic- SD/MMC 8GB
7GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 17.7
Write 6.5
Mixed 6.2
11% 10.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.8
108% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 12%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 32GB
16GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 141
Write 50.9
Mixed 67.7
95% 86.5 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 2
177% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
66.9% Good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 26
MC Mixed 19.9
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 16.7
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 12 10 64 0" 1280 720
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM_FX506HM Builds (Compare 2,807 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM_FX506HM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback