HP EliteBook 830 G8 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics14.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP EliteBook 830 G8 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 880D
Memory8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220518
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '24 at 08:25
Run Duration78 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1145G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
56.7% Above average
Memory 55.1
1-Core 145
2-Core 242
79% 147 Pts
4-Core 315
8-Core 448
48% 381 Pts
64-Core 464
29% 464 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
HP(103C 880D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.3358
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Lighting 18.1
Reflection 22.6
Parallax 20.6
15% 20.4 fps
MRender 14.9
Gravity 21.6
Splatting 15.1
14% 17.2 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF2G64HZ-3G2F1 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
41.6% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 11.4
42% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 12.5
38% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 5: 0P 1R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
5% 11% 9 111 59 0 13.2" 1280 720 AUO8B99
Typical EliteBook 830 G8 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 315 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 830 G8 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $285Nvidia RTX 4060 $285Crucial MX500 250GB $32
Intel Core i5-12400F $149Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $299Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4070 $530Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $46Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $346SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback