Performance Results

Gaming 233%
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 248%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics293% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A94
MotherboardMSI X299 RAIDER (MS-7A94)  (all builds)
Memory20.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170720
Uptime8.3 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '24 at 05:18
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900X-$610
CPU0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Memory 77.4
1-Core 124
2-Core 249
82% 150 Pts
4-Core 481
8-Core 920
83% 700 Pts
64-Core 1,542
96% 1,542 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$960
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5600 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (60th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
293% Outstanding
Lighting 439
Reflection 413
Parallax 450
358% 434 fps
MRender 546
Gravity 370
Splatting 264
307% 393 fps
Poor: 263%
This bench: 293%
Great: 305%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$211
494GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 438 440 454 448 452 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 486
Write 432
Mixed 329
SusWrite 445
95% 423 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 87.1
4K Mixed 39.1
141% 51.9 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 284
232% 330 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 106%
Great: 133%
Samsung 870 EVO 2TB-$150
155GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 456 458 452 457 452 453 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 465
Mixed 438
SusWrite 455
104% 463 MB/s
4K Read 41.9
4K Write 86.2
4K Mixed 55.3
180% 61.1 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 357
268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 120%
Great: 136%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52.5% Above average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 25.1
MC Mixed 15.2
54% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 22
SC Mixed 11.4
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 84.6
47% 84.6 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 164%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 16: 0P 1R 3G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
16% 33% 18 167 2 60 27" 1280 720 SAM0D32 C27F390
Typical X299 RAIDER (MS-7A94) Builds (Compare 921 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI X299 RAIDER (MS-7A94)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $788
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $199Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $378WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback