Asus MAXIMUS VIII EXTREME

Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	28.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	89.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 months ago, 5 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS VIII EXTREME (all builds)
Memory	4.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180314
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Feb 12 '24 at 22:21
Run Duration	217 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170 588,978 User benchmarks, average bench 81% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	82.5% Excellent	Memory 90.7 1-Core 124 2-Core 228 84% 148 Pts	4-Core 400 8-Core 628 63% 514 Pts	64-Core 620 38% 620 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 82.5% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 8626) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28.7% Poor	Lighting 36.1 Reflection 40.4 Parallax 37.4 29% 38 fps	MRender 37.3 Gravity 38.1 Splatting 27.1 27% 34.2 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28.7% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 116GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 228 224 229 221 217 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	89.7% Excellent	Read 493 Write 247 Mixed 262 SusWrite 228 68% 308 MB/s	4K Read 31.5 4K Write 82.4 4K Mixed 35.4 137% 49.8 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 262 DQ Mixed 210 187% 284 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 89.7% Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$27 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 741GB free Firmware: CC4H SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 186 190 189 192 190 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 168 Write 150 Mixed 83 SusWrite 187 107% 147 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 154% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 112%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 469GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 95.9 Write 92.1 Mixed 39 56% 75.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.4 79% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 67%
Samsung HD502HI 500GB-$154 24,344 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 125GB free Firmware: 1AG01113 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 82 82 82 83 83 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	47.6% Average	Read 83.7 Write 44.8 Mixed 51.8 SusWrite 82 48% 65.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 139% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 59%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 763GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 58 50 42 51 68 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	46.6% Average	Read 108 Write 101 Mixed 53.4 SusWrite 54.1 58% 79.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.5 102% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 84%
WD Purple 2TB (2014)-$67 19,126 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 139 137 142 142 142 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	78% Very good	Read 132 Write 130 Mixed 73.5 SusWrite 140 87% 119 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 186% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 78% Great: 86%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500GB-$159 43,620 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 463GB free Firmware: GM4OA52A SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 83 82 82 84 83 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	46.5% Average	Read 78.7 Write 79.8 Mixed 43 SusWrite 82.9 52% 71.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 51%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 32GB-$16 13,359 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 5GB free, PID 5583 SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 35 11 2.6 2.1 2.9 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	29.3% Poor	Read 152 Write 58.6 Mixed 58.1 SusWrite 16 78% 71.2 MB/s	4K Read 6.8 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 1.2 90% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 29.3% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$44 215,644 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	68.3% Good	MC Read 26.3 MC Write 25.4 MC Mixed 20.3 69% 24 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 24.3 SC Mixed 22 58% 20.2 GB/s	Latency 64.9 62% 64.9 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 107%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	59	144	24"	1280 720	ACI24E1 VG248

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAXIMUS VIII EXTREME Builds (Compare 539 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 87%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 73%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII EXTREME - $185

CPU
Core i7-6700KIntel $170Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	380x
Core i7-7700KIntel $200Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	81x
Core i7-6700Intel $170Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	16x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	104x
GTX 980-TiNvidia $560Bench 79%, 214,030 samples	48x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	42x

SSD
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $330Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	44x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	26x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	21x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $44Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	16x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	15x
CMU16GX4M2A2666C16 CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 CMU16GX4M2A2666C16 24GBCorsairBench 65%, 14 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $924

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235	Nvidia RTX 4070 $499	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342