HP OMEN by HP 25L Gaming Desktop GT15-1xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics157% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP OMEN by HP 25L Gaming Desktop GT15-1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8B1D
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230920
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '24 at 21:56
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13400F-$167
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Memory 69.4
1-Core 166
2-Core 324
98% 186 Pts
4-Core 617
8-Core 1,085
103% 851 Pts
64-Core 1,450
90% 1,450 Pts
Poor: 101%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti-$389
HP(103C 8C36) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
157% Outstanding
Lighting 221
Reflection 198
Parallax 218
180% 212 fps
MRender 291
Gravity 171
Splatting 128
153% 197 fps
Poor: 126%
This bench: 157%
Great: 157%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD_BLACK Gen4 SDCPNRY-1T00-1106 1TB
849GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,995
Write 2078
Mixed 2,026
524% 2,366 MB/s
4K Read 51.2
4K Write 91.4
4K Mixed 54.7
196% 65.8 MB/s
DQ Read 989
DQ Write 349
DQ Mixed 657
488% 665 MB/s
Poor: 219% Great: 521%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$133
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 34.7
Write 34.5
Mixed 28.7
24% 32.6 MB/s
4K Read 7.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1
450% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 57% Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP52U40S6HM-8FRAE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
133% Outstanding
MC Read 58.3
MC Write 47.8
MC Mixed 48.8
148% 51.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.5
SC Write 41.8
SC Mixed 26.1
83% 29.1 GB/s
Latency 91.6
44% 91.6 ns
Poor: 112%
This bench: 133%
Great: 143%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 30 10 60 35" 3440 1369 GSM7755 LG HDR WQHD
Typical OMEN by HP 25L Gaming Desktop GT15-1xxx Builds (Compare 208 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 111%
UFO

System: HP OMEN by HP 25L Gaming Desktop GT15-1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $423
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback