Intel X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics44.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive127% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemINTEL
MotherboardIntel X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231008
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '24 at 20:07
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
67.8% Good
Memory 77
1-Core 68.5
2-Core 137
57% 94.3 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 549
52% 432 Pts
64-Core 793
49% 793 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-2048SP
AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1286 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
44.3% Average
Lighting 54.5
Reflection 59.8
Parallax 74.8
44% 63 fps
MRender 60
Gravity 60.8
Splatting 44.4
44% 55.1 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg40znv128g KIOXIA 128GB
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP00AE00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 686 688 521 214 213 187 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 1,089
Write 794
Mixed 798
SusWrite 418
173% 775 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 57.6
4K Mixed 39
134% 44 MB/s
DQ Read 480
DQ Write 270
DQ Mixed 405
293% 385 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 127%
Great: 202%
S900-512 512GB
477GB free
Firmware: W0201A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 422 410 403 409 408 408 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
79.5% Very good
Read 468
Write 412
Mixed 386
SusWrite 410
94% 419 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 58.5
4K Mixed 16.8
93% 34 MB/s
DQ Read 72.9
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 29.6
70% 137 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 94%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
466GB free
Firmware: KC67
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 121 121 121 122 121 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
68.2% Good
Read 117
Write 117
Mixed 63.4
SusWrite 121
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351R7CFR4A Micron 18KSF51272PZ- HMT351R7CFR4A Micron 18KSF51272PZ- 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.4% Average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 15.6
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 9.2
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 91.4
44% 91.4 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 52 60 23" 1280 720 DEL4073 DELL U2312HM
Typical X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset Builds (Compare 476 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Intel X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $92
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback