Intel X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics44.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive138% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemINTEL
MotherboardIntel X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231008
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 01 '24 at 12:55
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
68.1% Good
Memory 77.6
1-Core 79.5
2-Core 163
62% 107 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 578
54% 447 Pts
64-Core 794
49% 794 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-2048SP
AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1286 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
44.5% Average
Lighting 54.8
Reflection 60
Parallax 75.7
45% 63.5 fps
MRender 60
Gravity 61
Splatting 44.5
44% 55.2 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg40znv128g KIOXIA 128GB
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP00AE00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 683 688 482 217 216 215 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
138% Outstanding
Read 1173
Write 808
Mixed 811
SusWrite 417
179% 802 MB/s
4K Read 36.8
4K Write 65.7
4K Mixed 50.2
155% 50.9 MB/s
DQ Read 489
DQ Write 270
DQ Mixed 405
294% 388 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 138%
Great: 202%
S900-512 512GB
477GB free
Firmware: W0201A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 425 419 410 420 419 418 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Read 467
Write 429
Mixed 395
SusWrite 419
96% 427 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 67.5
4K Mixed 19
103% 38.4 MB/s
DQ Read 72.2
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 29.4
71% 140 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 94%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
116GB free
Firmware: KC67
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 74 74 74 74 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
46.7% Average
Read 89.1
Write 92.8
Mixed 48.9
SusWrite 73.8
56% 76.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351R7CFR4A Micron 18KSF51272PZ- HMT351R7CFR4A Micron 18KSF51272PZ- 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
45.8% Average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 15.5
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 10.9
SC Mixed 10.5
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 84.9
47% 84.9 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 60 23" 1280 720 HWP2821 HP 2309
Typical X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset Builds (Compare 476 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Intel X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $92
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback