Asus TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	115% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX504GM
Memory	9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210823
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 12 '24 at 17:46
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8750H 442,631 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	64.5% Good	Memory 86.2 1-Core 93.5 2-Core 161 68% 113 Pts	4-Core 233 8-Core 398 38% 315 Pts	64-Core 444 28% 444 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 64.5% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 1391) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111 Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	4.24% Terrible	Lighting 4.5 Reflection 7.3 Parallax 6.3 4% 6.03 fps	MRender 8.6 Gravity 0.1 Splatting 9.8 5% 6.17 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.24% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
CT500P3SSD8 500GB 13,020 User benchmarks, average bench 198% 362GB free (System drive) Firmware: P9CR30A SusWrite @10s intervals: 999 384 55 43 58 311 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	115% Outstanding	Read 935 Write 1,562 Mixed 1,116 SusWrite 308 222% 980 MB/s	4K Read 31.9 4K Write 61.9 4K Mixed 43 136% 45.6 MB/s	DQ Read 447 DQ Write 275 DQ Mixed 378 277% 367 MB/s
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 305%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$56 127,507 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 506GB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 6 6.5 6.2 5.4 5.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	2.34% Terrible	Read 2 Write 6.9 Mixed 4.5 SusWrite 6.1 4% 4.88 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 8% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 2.34% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 04CB 16GB 654 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	62.1% Good	MC Read 24.1 MC Write 22.6 MC Mixed 20.1 64% 22.3 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 21.6 SC Mixed 18.6 50% 17.5 GB/s	Latency 83.4 48% 83.4 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	3	177	20	120	15.5"	1536 864	CMN15F4

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM Builds (Compare 1,213 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 35%

Sail boat

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 30%

Sail boat

System: Asus TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	732x
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples	481x

GPU
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	635x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	577x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	1x

SSD
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ 256GBKingstonBench 96%, 18,615 samples	218x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	199x
RBUSNS8154P3128GJ 128GBKingstonBench 81%, 18,233 samples	172x

RAM
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 73,050 samples	234x
HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK 1x16GBHynixBench 44%, 33,430 samples	175x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	86x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16