Asus ROG CROSSHAIR X670E HERO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 113%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive	380% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Motherboard	Asus ROG CROSSHAIR X670E HERO (all builds)
Memory	47 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20231214
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Feb 12 '24 at 17:44
Run Duration	401 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D-$319 4,385 User benchmarks, average bench 117% AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	113% Outstanding	Memory 95.4 1-Core 185 2-Core 354 114% 211 Pts	4-Core 695 8-Core 1,239 116% 967 Pts	64-Core 1,816 112% 1,816 Pts
Poor: 105% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 122%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,787 25,956 User benchmarks, average bench 370% Asus(1043 889C) ≥ 4GB; ROG-STRIX-RTX4090-O24G-GAMING CLim: 3150 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 551.23 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 534 Reflection 579 Parallax 800 435% 638 fps	Gravity 569 Splatting 301 366% 435 fps
Poor: 303% Great: 407%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$170 45,230 User benchmarks, average bench 460% 1TB free (System drive) Firmware: 4B2QJXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 3341 3374 3485 2244 1568 1578 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	380% Outstanding	Read 1,605 Write 3,631 Mixed 2,848 SusWrite 2,598 610% 2,671 MB/s	4K Read 64.7 4K Write 149 4K Mixed 86.5 288% 100 MB/s	DQ Read 1,704 DQ Write 1,358 DQ Mixed 1,492 1,127% 1,518 MB/s
Poor: 299% ↑ This bench: 380% Great: 592%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170 93,447 User benchmarks, average bench 322% 56GB free Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,242 Write 1,518 Mixed 1,077 356% 1,613 MB/s	4K Read 45.7 4K Write 118 4K Mixed 63 212% 75.6 MB/s	DQ Read 1,464 DQ Write 1,331 DQ Mixed 1,470 1,083% 1,422 MB/s
Poor: 195% Great: 393%
Samsung 870 EVO 2TB-$190 31,076 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 240GB free Firmware: SVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 398 255 394 411 145 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	74.3% Very good	Read 423 Write 399 Mixed 320 SusWrite 329 83% 368 MB/s	4K Read 28.2 4K Write 82.6 4K Mixed 10.1 99% 40.3 MB/s	DQ Read 176 DQ Write 246 DQ Mixed 13.1 65% 145 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 136%
Samsung 870 EVO 2TB-$190 31,076 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 41GB free Firmware: SVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 405 296 234 218 221 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	95.3% Outstanding	Read 452 Write 438 Mixed 342 SusWrite 292 86% 381 MB/s	4K Read 29.1 4K Write 84.7 4K Mixed 38.9 139% 50.9 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 360 DQ Mixed 294 242% 347 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 95.3% Great: 136%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 43GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 160 162 161 158 151 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	79.1% Very good	Read 462 Write 182 Mixed 236 SusWrite 170 58% 262 MB/s	4K Read 25 4K Write 86.3 4K Mixed 31.9 124% 47.7 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 164 DQ Mixed 179 158% 243 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 79.1% Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 28GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 427 430 320 217 184 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 461 Write 425 Mixed 393 SusWrite 336 91% 404 MB/s	4K Read 40.4 4K Write 84.4 4K Mixed 50.2 170% 58.3 MB/s	DQ Read 385 DQ Write 358 DQ Mixed 298 244% 347 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 36GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 333 274 257 250 251 248 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	80.4% Excellent	Read 328 Write 315 Mixed 302 SusWrite 269 68% 303 MB/s	4K Read 31.8 4K Write 59.1 4K Mixed 40.8 132% 43.9 MB/s	DQ Read 243 DQ Write 189 DQ Mixed 208 158% 214 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 80.4% Great: 124%
JMicron Generic DISK03 1TB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 623GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 5.1 5.1 5.1 4.8 4.6 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	19.6% Very poor	Read 50.5 Write 35 Mixed 31.2 SusWrite 4.9 37% 30.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 3.5 4K Mixed 1.8 187% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 19.6% Great: 56%
JMicron Generic DISK02 500GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 243GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 33 33 33 34 34 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	16.3% Very poor	Read 35.1 Write 36.4 Mixed 28 SusWrite 33.2 45% 33.2 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 68% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 16.3% Great: 75%
JMicron Generic DISK00 8TB 44 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	11.5% Very poor	Read 31.6 Write 33.9 Mixed 28.6 SusWrite 0.1 30% 23.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 99% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 11.5% Great: 76%
JMicron Generic DISK04 1TB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 461GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	9.45% Terrible	Read 33.6 Write 36.4 Mixed 28.9 SusWrite 0.3 32% 24.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 75% 1 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.45% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G Skill Intl F5-6000J3040G322x31.5GB 4,648 User benchmarks, average bench 189% 2 of 4 slots used 63GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	203% Outstanding	MC Read 80.3 MC Write 69.4 MC Mixed 72.4 212% 74 GB/s	SC Read 58.9 SC Write 73.3 SC Mixed 61.6 185% 64.6 GB/s	Latency 54.8 73% 54.8 ns
Poor: 149% ↑ This bench: 203% Great: 257%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	66	53	144	26.9"	1280 720	AUS272A ROG XG27UQ

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG CROSSHAIR X670E HERO Builds (Compare 120 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 402%

UFO

Desktop 115%

UFO

Workstation 528%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG CROSSHAIR X670E HERO

CPU
Ryzen 9 7950XAMD $472Bench 114%, 3,143 samples	37x
Ryzen 9 7900XAMD $365Bench 113%, 4,545 samples	29x
Ryzen 7 7800X3DAMD $319Bench 117%, 4,385 samples	26x

GPU
RTX 4090Nvidia $1,787Bench 370%, 25,956 samples	50x
RTX 4070-TiNvidia $780Bench 240%, 46,082 samples	14x
RTX 4080Nvidia $1,000Bench 290%, 22,998 samples	8x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $170Bench 416%, 138,083 samples	20x
990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $170Bench 460%, 45,230 samples	14x
SKC3000D2048G 2TBKingstonBench 458%, 10,369 samples	12x

RAM
F5-6000J3038F16G 2x16GBUnknownBench 190%, 9,902 samples	15x
CMH32GX5M2D6000Z36 4x16GBCorsairBench 177%, 170 samples	12x
Skill Intl F5-6000J3040G322x31.5GBGBench 189%, 4,648 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $2,429

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16