Asrock H370M Pro4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics75.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock H370M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191205
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '24 at 15:26
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$126
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Memory 91.5
1-Core 124
2-Core 243
86% 153 Pts
4-Core 483
8-Core 628
71% 556 Pts
64-Core 637
39% 637 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
Nvidia(10DE 2182) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
75.4% Very good
Lighting 95.9
Reflection 96.1
Parallax 87.5
78% 93.2 fps
MRender 98.1
Gravity 88.5
Splatting 74.8
70% 87.1 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
39GB free
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,802
Write 1406
Mixed 622
281% 1,277 MB/s
4K Read 49.1
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 53.1
200% 70.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,112
DQ Write 1,087
DQ Mixed 683
628% 961 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
165GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 489
Write 466
Mixed 379
99% 445 MB/s
4K Read 37.4
4K Write 76.4
4K Mixed 46.5
157% 53.4 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 227
204% 310 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$46
929GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 194 186 186 185 187 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 197
Write 184
Mixed 75.9
SusWrite 188
118% 161 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
149% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 110%
Great: 113%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
21GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 40.3
Write 4.2
Mixed 10.2
17% 18.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.2
26% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5713-001.A00G 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
62.7% Good
MC Read 26.4
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 17.6
62% 21.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 22.3
SC Mixed 20.7
56% 19.5 GB/s
Latency 61.7
65% 61.7 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 32 9 30 26.9" 1280 720 GBT2704 AORUS CV27Q
Typical H370M Pro4 Builds (Compare 398 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock H370M Pro4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $211
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $285Nvidia RTX 4060 $285Crucial MX500 250GB $32
Intel Core i5-12400F $149Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $340Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $46Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $44SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $346SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback