Asrock H370M Pro4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 67% Battle cruiser	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 55% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	75.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock H370M Pro4 (all builds)
Memory	3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191205
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 12 '24 at 15:26
Run Duration	182 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	89.6% Excellent	Memory 91.5 1-Core 124 2-Core 243 86% 153 Pts	4-Core 483 8-Core 628 71% 556 Pts	64-Core 637 39% 637 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 89.6% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143 318,562 User benchmarks, average bench 76% Nvidia(10DE 2182) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 551.23 Performing below potential (45^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	75.4% Very good	Lighting 95.9 Reflection 96.1 Parallax 87.5 78% 93.2 fps	MRender 98.1 Gravity 88.5 Splatting 74.8 70% 87.1 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 75.4% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$75 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 39GB free Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,802 Write 1406 Mixed 622 281% 1,277 MB/s	4K Read 49.1 4K Write 108 4K Mixed 53.1 200% 70.2 MB/s	DQ Read 1,112 DQ Write 1,087 DQ Mixed 683 628% 961 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$62 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 165GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB0Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 489 Write 466 Mixed 379 99% 445 MB/s	4K Read 37.4 4K Write 76.4 4K Mixed 46.5 157% 53.4 MB/s	DQ Read 372 DQ Write 330 DQ Mixed 227 204% 310 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$35 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 929GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 194 186 186 185 187 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 197 Write 184 Mixed 75.9 SusWrite 188 118% 161 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 149% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 113%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9 66,405 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 21GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 40.3 Write 4.2 Mixed 10.2 17% 18.2 MB/s	4K Read 5.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.2 26% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 28%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5713-001.A00G 2x4GB 378 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	62.7% Good	MC Read 26.4 MC Write 20.6 MC Mixed 17.6 62% 21.5 GB/s	SC Read 15.6 SC Write 22.3 SC Mixed 20.7 56% 19.5 GB/s	Latency 61.7 65% 61.7 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 62.7% Great: 77%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	32	9	30	26.9"	1280 720	GBT2704 AORUS CV27Q

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H370M Pro4 Builds (Compare 423 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 30%

Raft

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock H370M Pro4

CPU
Core i5-8400Intel $85Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	77x
Core i5-9600KIntel $135Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	66x
Core i7-8700Intel $160Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	56x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	38x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	32x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	26x

SSD
TM8PS7256G 256GBTeamBench 70%, 5,014 samples	38x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	17x
A400 240GBKingston $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	9x

RAM
CMK8GX4M1A2400C16 029E CMK8GX4M1A2666C16 16GBUnknownBench 72%, 138 samples	21x
CMK8GX4M1A2666C16 029E CMK8GX4M1A2400C16 16GBUnknownBench 69%, 136 samples	17x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $38Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 115% - Outstanding

Total price: $144

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $98	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $205	Nvidia RTX 4070 $519	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380