Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-B550 GAMING X V2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 137%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 158%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics137% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive31.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B550 GAMING X V2  (all builds)
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220104
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '24 at 14:44
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$220
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
99.9% Outstanding
Memory 73.8
1-Core 172
2-Core 345
103% 197 Pts
4-Core 672
8-Core 1,277
116% 975 Pts
64-Core 2,276
141% 2,276 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$450
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 545.84
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
137% Outstanding
Lighting 197
Reflection 186
Parallax 177
160% 187 fps
MRender 183
Gravity 139
Splatting 125
119% 149 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 137%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kioxia-exceria SATA SSD 480GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFA15.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 289 6.8 53 53 6.4 53 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.4% Below average
Read 236
Write 105
Mixed 90.3
SusWrite 76.8
28% 127 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 20.3
4K Mixed 11.8
56% 17.3 MB/s
DQ Read 13.9
DQ Write 14.8
DQ Mixed 14.2
11% 14.3 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 100%
Lexar NM620 1TB
317GB free
Firmware: V1.23
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2321 2385 2085 997 999 997 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
312% Outstanding
Read 1,955
Write 2,484
Mixed 1,779
SusWrite 1,631
443% 1,962 MB/s
4K Read 67
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 69.8
275% 98.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,313
DQ Write 987
DQ Mixed 98.4
359% 799 MB/s
Poor: 170%
This bench: 312%
Great: 348%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3600C17D4/8GX 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
83.6% Excellent
MC Read 35.2
MC Write 29.2
MC Mixed 28.4
88% 30.9 GB/s
SC Read 22.5
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 26.9
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 93.1
43% 93.1 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 54 144 23.5" 1280 720 MSI3EA2 MSI MAG241C
Typical GA-B550 GAMING X V2 Builds (Compare 5,140 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B550 GAMING X V2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $485
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback