Asrock X79 Extreme4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics33.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock X79 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140213
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '24 at 16:37
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4820K-$110
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Memory 87.6
1-Core 88.1
2-Core 176
69% 117 Pts
4-Core 313
8-Core 431
47% 372 Pts
64-Core 481
30% 481 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
33.5% Below average
Lighting 44.3
Reflection 41.1
Parallax 39.2
36% 41.5 fps
MRender 37.2
Gravity 41.6
Splatting 27.7
28% 35.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 521ABBF0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 114
Write 93.4
Mixed 110
24% 106 MB/s
4K Read 18.6
4K Write 41.4
4K Mixed 23.4
80% 27.8 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 92.6
DQ Mixed 74.8
64% 95.2 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 73%
Tph01203000gb 0 3TB
1TB free
Firmware: MF8OAC50
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 135 135 134 134 137 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
77.4% Very good
Read 134
Write 139
Mixed 57
SusWrite 135
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
201% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Team-Elite-16 Team-Elite-16 CT51264BA160B CT51264BA160B 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
82.1% Excellent
MC Read 30.2
MC Write 33.8
MC Mixed 31.1
91% 31.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 11.7
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 67.1
60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 52 60 24" 1280 720 GSM5723 W2486
Typical X79 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 251 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock X79 Extreme4 - $290

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $818
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback