Gigabyte Z390 GAMING X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 123%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive87.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte Z390 GAMING X
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 GAMING X  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191015
Uptime6.2 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '24 at 12:47
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600KF-$180
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Memory 92.4
1-Core 136
2-Core 270
92% 166 Pts
4-Core 530
8-Core 696
78% 613 Pts
64-Core 700
43% 700 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Nvidia(10DE 2486) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
131% Outstanding
Lighting 183
Reflection 177
Parallax 167
149% 176 fps
MRender 192
Gravity 137
Splatting 118
118% 149 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 131%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7PD256HCGM-000H7 256GB
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM06H6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 207 169 172 224 245 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Read 468
Write 192
Mixed 272
SusWrite 212
63% 286 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 73.7
4K Mixed 38.7
134% 47.6 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 260
DQ Mixed 158
160% 262 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 108%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38
26GB free
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 97 101 101 104 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
60.8% Good
Read 293
Write 122
Mixed 169
SusWrite 99.9
38% 171 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 73.9
4K Mixed 33.8
124% 45 MB/s
DQ Read 93.1
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 102
79% 106 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 73%
Samsung HD403LJ 400GB-$183
49GB free
Firmware: CT100-12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 46 44 45 44 45 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
28.5% Poor
Read 54.3
Write 62
Mixed 43.6
SusWrite 44.8
38% 51.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 42%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB
169GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 149 149 135 166 152 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Read 100
Write 96.1
Mixed 74.4
SusWrite 153
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
201% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 110%
Asmt USB 3.0 Destop H 500GB
102GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 78 78 78 78 79 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
43.7% Average
Read 74.3
Write 71.6
Mixed 43.2
SusWrite 78.1
49% 66.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
88% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB-$41
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.5% Very good
MC Read 27.9
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 21.2
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 21.6
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 34.1" 2560 1017 GSM76FA LG ULTRAWIDE
Typical GA-Z390 GAMING X-CF Builds (Compare 11,909 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 GAMING X - $225

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 116% - Outstanding Total price: $788
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback