Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory24.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '24 at 03:11
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 62%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320E-$87
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
54% Above average
Memory 80.4
1-Core 53.5
2-Core 92.9
49% 75.6 Pts
4-Core 153
8-Core 212
23% 183 Pts
64-Core 250
15% 250 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 54%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Zotac(19DA 730B) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
4.88% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 4.7
Parallax 7.5
5% 6.03 fps
MRender 3.8
Gravity 7.1
Splatting 7
5% 5.97 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.88%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$74
501GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 558 546 406 430 383 274 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 760
Write 742
Mixed 597
SusWrite 433
142% 633 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 57.7
4K Mixed 35.1
115% 39.5 MB/s
DQ Read 362
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 240
195% 279 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 106%
Great: 276%
Adata Ultimate SU800 512GB-$65
477GB free
Firmware: P0801A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 309 311 325 322 318 334 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Read 408
Write 344
Mixed 339
SusWrite 320
79% 353 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 42.9
4K Mixed 28.5
89% 30.3 MB/s
DQ Read 243
DQ Write 206
DQ Mixed 209
161% 219 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 127%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR3-1600 CL11 8GB 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
46.2% Average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 17
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 10.4
25% 8.73 GB/s
Latency 79.5
50% 79.5 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 34.1" 1280 720 GSM76F9 LG ULTRAWIDE
Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 755 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4070 $515Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback