Asus M5A97

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive68.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A97  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111124
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '24 at 02:51
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 B95
AM3r2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.25 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Memory 91.2
1-Core 45.7
2-Core 91.6
51% 76.2 Pts
4-Core 149
8-Core 176
21% 163 Pts
64-Core 174
11% 174 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 58%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
147GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03200001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 333 355 210 58 35 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 405
Write 351
Mixed 295
SusWrite 176
69% 307 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 50.7
4K Mixed 33.4
112% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 161
DQ Write 149
DQ Mixed 125
102% 145 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 250GB-$23
147GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 113 113 114 115 114 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
67.1% Good
Read 121
Write 132
Mixed 63.6
SusWrite 113
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
134% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 74%
Seagate Expansion 2TB
205GB free
Firmware: 0710
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 25.6
Write 26.5
Mixed 21.7
18% 24.6 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.8
189% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
35.3% Below average
MC Read 15
MC Write 7.9
MC Mixed 13.3
34% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 9.2
22% 7.63 GB/s
Latency 66.5
60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 56 42 60 0" 1280 720
Typical M5A97 Builds (Compare 318 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 - $89

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $495
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback