Acer Nitro N50-650

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 150%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics155% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Nitro N50-650  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Nitro N50-650
Memory20.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221209
Uptime7.2 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '24 at 02:42
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13400F-$165
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
Memory 74
1-Core 166
2-Core 332
100% 191 Pts
4-Core 657
8-Core 1,051
105% 854 Pts
64-Core 1,443
89% 1,443 Pts
Poor: 102%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti-$385
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
155% Outstanding
Lighting 216
Reflection 196
Parallax 221
176% 211 fps
MRender 306
Gravity 169
Splatting 127
155% 201 fps
Poor: 126%
This bench: 155%
Great: 157%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014 512GB
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 73101100 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,726
Write 3237
Mixed 2,099
670% 3,021 MB/s
4K Read 66.7
4K Write 160
4K Mixed 82.3
291% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 1,513
DQ Write 1,113
DQ Mixed 1,254
953% 1,293 MB/s
Poor: 217% Great: 480%
Nvme Samsung SSD 980 PRO 1TB
517GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3323 3259 3302 1789 1509 1497 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
406% Outstanding
Read 2,536
Write 3,203
Mixed 2,830
SusWrite 2,446
623% 2,754 MB/s
4K Read 68.9
4K Write 171
4K Mixed 110
336% 117 MB/s
DQ Read 1,244
DQ Write 977
DQ Mixed 1,095
824% 1,105 MB/s
Poor: 252%
This bench: 406%
Great: 489%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 159 160 160 159 158 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Read 161
Write 152
Mixed 106
SusWrite 159
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
227% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3200C16-16GVK 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
81.7% Excellent
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 29.2
MC Mixed 28.8
86% 30.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 29.6
SC Mixed 21.4
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 95.9
42% 95.9 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 52 170 31.5" 1280 720 MSI4DB4 MSI G32CQ5P
Typical Nitro N50-650 Builds (Compare 185 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 130%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

System: Acer Nitro N50-650

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $458
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback