Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IU_FA506IU

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics66.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IU_FA506IU  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FA506IU
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220426
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '24 at 22:23
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 4900H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Memory 80.5
1-Core 128
2-Core 253
84% 154 Pts
4-Core 484
8-Core 814
79% 649 Pts
64-Core 1,128
70% 1,128 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)
Asus(1043 16CF) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.14
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
66.6% Good
Lighting 83.5
Reflection 88.7
Parallax 76.6
68% 82.9 fps
MRender 93.3
Gravity 74.6
Splatting 69.9
64% 79.3 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA512QFD 512GB
362GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P6MA001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,571
Write 1,019
Mixed 958
261% 1,183 MB/s
4K Read 53.4
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 68.7
227% 77.5 MB/s
DQ Read 615
DQ Write 908
DQ Mixed 263
339% 595 MB/s
Poor: 102% Great: 247%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
235GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,373
Write 2,167
Mixed 1,549
451% 2,030 MB/s
4K Read 53
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 68.8
223% 74.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,348
DQ Write 888
DQ Mixed 1,073
812% 1,103 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905711-035.A00G Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
77.4% Very good
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 25.6
80% 27.9 GB/s
SC Read 20.1
SC Write 28.6
SC Mixed 20.4
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 81.5
49% 81.5 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 51 144 15.5" 1280 720 NCP004D
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IU_FA506IU Builds (Compare 628 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IU_FA506IU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback