Emaxx EMX-A70FM2+iCafe

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive26.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemEmaxx EMX-A70FM2+iCafe  (all builds)
MotherboardEMAXX EMX-A70FM2+iCafe
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190409
Uptime5.1 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '24 at 13:03
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7680 Radeon R7, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6G
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
48.6% Average
Memory 65.7
1-Core 63.5
2-Core 118
50% 82.3 Pts
4-Core 184
8-Core 181
24% 183 Pts
64-Core 189
12% 189 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Dell(1028 1083) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
4.9% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 9.3
Parallax 8.3
5% 7.8 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 7.1
5% 6.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.9%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 2.5" 120GB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0324A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 74 44 45 37 48 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26.3% Poor
Read 240
Write 160
Mixed 178
SusWrite 59.4
36% 159 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 17.6
4K Mixed 5.2
39% 12.6 MB/s
DQ Read 14.5
DQ Write 73.2
DQ Mixed 16.1
20% 34.6 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 78%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
105GB free
Firmware: KC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 78 78 76 91 93 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
47.1% Average
Read 82.6
Write 97
Mixed 49
SusWrite 81.6
57% 77.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
115% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-034.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.7% Below average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 8.6
MC Mixed 13.8
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 9.9
21% 7.23 GB/s
Latency 172
23% 172 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 37 17 60 18.5" 1280 720 DELA03E DELL S1909W
Typical EMX-A70FM2+iCafe Builds (Compare 153 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Emaxx EMX-A70FM2+iCafe

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 12% - Very poor Total price: $26
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback