PC NP50DE_DB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics40.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemPC NP50DE_DB  (all builds)
MotherboardCLEVO NP50Dx
Memory13.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200217
Uptime11.7 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '24 at 11:52
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
65.8% Good
Memory 84
1-Core 105
2-Core 145
68% 111 Pts
4-Core 262
8-Core 352
39% 307 Pts
64-Core 420
26% 420 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-Ti (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 8668) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.5123
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
40.4% Average
Lighting 47.9
Reflection 68
Parallax 41
39% 52.3 fps
MRender 62.2
Gravity 49.8
Splatting 48.4
43% 53.5 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 47%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
1TB PCS 2.5" SSD 1TB
138GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0630A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 396 432 379 79 53 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
33.5% Below average
Read 450
Write 10.2
Mixed 8.2
SusWrite 250
39% 180 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
1% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X16GE2400C16S4 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
67.7% Good
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 23.8
MC Mixed 21.7
67% 23.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 29.6
SC Mixed 21.4
62% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 64 51 144 15.5" 1280 720 NCP004D
Typical NP50DE_DB Builds (Compare 60 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: PC NP50DE_DB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback