Asus PRIME X470-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (3rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 97 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics173% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive45.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (85%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME X470-PRO  (all builds)
Memory16.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210810
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '24 at 05:12
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 85%

 PC Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
54.6% Above average
Memory 59.1
1-Core 87.2
2-Core 148
56% 98.1 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 381
41% 327 Pts
64-Core 611
38% 611 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
Nvidia(10DE 147D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 546.65
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
173% Outstanding
Lighting 225
Reflection 287
Parallax 272
183% 262 fps
MRender 351
Gravity 252
Splatting 182
205% 262 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 173%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid CT500P 500GB
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 453 6.1 35 38 42 43 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 786
Write 499
Mixed 9.7
SusWrite 103
76% 349 MB/s
4K Read 12.4
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 4.8
28% 7.33 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 189%
Amd-raid CT1000P 1TB
29GB free
Firmware: P9CR
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 548
Write 738
Mixed 616
143% 634 MB/s
4K Read 11.2
4K Write 33.5
4K Mixed 18.3
58% 21 MB/s
DQ Read 397
DQ Write 486
DQ Mixed 549
384% 477 MB/s
Poor: 196% Great: 320%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
271GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 59 60 64 68 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
46.2% Average
Read 96.4
Write 89.1
Mixed 51.1
SusWrite 64.6
55% 75.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
98% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB-$129
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
46% Average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 17.3
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 11.7
SC Mixed 10.8
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 141
28% 141 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 46%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 42 12 165 27" 2560 1440 DEL41D9 DELL S2721DGF
Typical PRIME X470-PRO Builds (Compare 5,610 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X470-PRO - $139

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $658
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback