Asrock N68C-GS4 FX

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	28.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	64.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock N68C-GS4 FX (all builds)
Memory	13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160216
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 09 '24 at 10:02
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	18%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	59.7% Above average	Memory 78.6 1-Core 67.1 2-Core 119 55% 88.1 Pts	4-Core 222 8-Core 385 37% 303 Pts	64-Core 389 24% 389 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 59.7% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3732) CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 551.23 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28.8% Poor	Lighting 36.3 Reflection 40.4 Parallax 41.9 30% 39.5 fps	MRender 37.7 Gravity 38.3 Splatting 27.1 27% 34.4 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28.8% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 882GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVQ0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 209 225 220 214 221 MB/s Performing below potential (47^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	64.6% Good	Read 214 Write 202 Mixed 190 SusWrite 212 46% 204 MB/s	4K Read 29.9 4K Write 60.8 4K Mixed 38.2 126% 43 MB/s	DQ Read 40.8 DQ Write 118 DQ Mixed 57.9 50% 72.1 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 77%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA 2TB 197 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 687GB free Firmware: MK7O SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 132 131 132 134 131 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	77.4% Very good	Read 138 Write 135 Mixed 74.9 SusWrite 132 88% 120 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 161% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 77.4% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT102464BA160B.M16 PSD38G16002 16GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1066, 1066 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	38.4% Below average	MC Read 14.1 MC Write 13.1 MC Mixed 13.2 38% 13.5 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 9.1 SC Mixed 10.7 27% 9.43 GB/s	Latency 84.7 47% 84.7 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 38.4% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	62	48	60	23.5"	1920 1017	SAM0D20 S24F350

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical N68C-GS4 FX Builds (Compare 92 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock N68C-GS4 FX

CPU
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	39x
FX-4300AMD $73Bench 52%, 55,454 samples	8x
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	3x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	11x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	6x
Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples	6x

SSD
0 240GBCt240bx5Bench 50%, 1,468 samples	4x
SSD Plus 240GBSanDisk $28Bench 61%, 133,640 samples	3x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	3x

RAM
99U5471-054.A00LF 2x8GBKingstonBench 53%, 9,823 samples	3x
PSD22G80026 PSD22G80026 4GBUnknownBench 22%, 22 samples	3x
M378B5773CH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 42%, 3,379 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 92% - Outstanding

Total price: $149

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16