HP Notebook

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Notebook  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 828B
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200609
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '24 at 09:28
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7500U VH
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Memory 77.7
1-Core 90.7
2-Core 164
65% 111 Pts
4-Core 227
8-Core 248
31% 238 Pts
64-Core 213
13% 213 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
HP(103C 828B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
4.21% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 6
Parallax 7
5% 6.47 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 8.6
Splatting 0.2
2% 3.03 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.21%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS1TMTS830S 1TB
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 22Z3V4EI
SusWrite @10s intervals: 308 334 364 307 352 345 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Read 315
Write 356
Mixed 273
SusWrite 335
72% 320 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 57.2
4K Mixed 33.1
109% 38.1 MB/s
DQ Read 340
DQ Write 293
DQ Mixed 94.1
131% 243 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 115%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AO1P24HC8T1-BQXS 86D3 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
65.3% Good
MC Read 23.3
MC Write 25.7
MC Mixed 20.8
66% 23.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 25.8
SC Mixed 21.2
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 64 51 60 17.2" 1280 720 AUO109D
Typical Notebook Builds (Compare 7,865 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Notebook

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback