Asus Q524UQK

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.36% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemAsus Q524UQK  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Q524UQK
Memory6.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161017
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 20 '23 at 02:34
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7500U VH
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
62.4% Good
Memory 83
1-Core 94.8
2-Core 155
67% 111 Pts
4-Core 243
8-Core 248
33% 246 Pts
64-Core 209
13% 209 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 940MX
Asus(1043 128E) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.4633
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
9.36% Terrible
Lighting 11.7
Reflection 9.6
Parallax 11.7
10% 11 fps
MRender 12.1
Gravity 13.1
Splatting 8.8
9% 11.3 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.36%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000P3SSD8 1TB
833GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR30A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 678
Write 730
Mixed 757
162% 722 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 63
4K Mixed 7.8
83% 32.3 MB/s
DQ Read 13
DQ Write 16.3
DQ Mixed 15
11% 14.8 MB/s
Poor: 102% Great: 394%
USB DISK 3.0 16GB
4GB free, PID 6300
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 56.9
Write 4
Mixed 32.3
32% 31.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
18% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 27%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6MFR8N-TF Samsung M471A5143EB0-CPB 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.9% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 11
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 11.7
SC Mixed 10.9
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 96.4
42% 96.4 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE065F
Typical Q524UQK Builds (Compare 251 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus Q524UQK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 120% - Outstanding Total price: $93
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback