Asus TUF GAMING Z490-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics116% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive266% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z490-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory20.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211029
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '24 at 09:27
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User BGD-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700K-$224
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Memory 81.4
1-Core 138
2-Core 266
89% 162 Pts
4-Core 510
8-Core 892
85% 701 Pts
64-Core 1,475
91% 1,475 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti-$361
Asus(1043 88F6) ≥ 4GB; Asus TUF Gaming RTX 4060-Ti
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.29
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
116% Outstanding
Lighting 153
Reflection 141
Parallax 154
124% 149 fps
MRender 210
Gravity 123
Splatting 90.6
110% 141 fps
Poor: 126%
This bench: 116%
Great: 157%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar NM620 1TB
605GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN10660
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1880 1831 1822 1852 1313 280 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
266% Outstanding
Read 1,453
Write 2,214
Mixed 1,549
SusWrite 1,497
380% 1,678 MB/s
4K Read 52.5
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 70.3
234% 81.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,185
DQ Write 770
DQ Mixed 598
548% 851 MB/s
Poor: 170%
This bench: 266%
Great: 348%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$38
110GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 181 184 185 179 183 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
99.9% Outstanding
Read 167
Write 62.5
Mixed 82.9
SusWrite 182
91% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 113%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
197GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 163 168 170 171 168 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 187
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 165
99% 138 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
153% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH16GX4M2E3200C16 CMW16GX4M2E3200C16 CMH16GX4M2E3200C16 CMW16GX4M2E3200C16 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
65.5% Good
MC Read 24
MC Write 25.7
MC Mixed 20.6
67% 23.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 23.1
SC Mixed 19.2
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 76.9
52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 27" 1280 720 AUS27C0 ASUS VZ279
Typical TUF GAMING Z490-PLUS Builds (Compare 3,558 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 142%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z490-PLUS - $299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $1,116
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback