Acer Predator PH317-52

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics30.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive121% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Predator PH317-52  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Sienna_CFS
Memory4.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit, Цвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit, Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190327
Uptime4.6 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '24 at 06:08
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
63% Good
Memory 82.1
1-Core 65.1
2-Core 130
57% 92.5 Pts
4-Core 239
8-Core 404
39% 321 Pts
64-Core 517
32% 517 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 63%
Great: 86%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 1266) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
5.08% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 6.5
Parallax 7.8
6% 7 fps
MRender 9
Gravity 8.9
Splatting 0.2
4% 6.03 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.08%
Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)
Acer(1025 1267) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
30.5% Below average
Lighting 39.3
Reflection 39.6
Parallax 37.5
32% 38.8 fps
MRender 37.4
Gravity 40.2
Splatting 26.6
28% 34.7 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 760p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$33
108GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 001C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 487 268 143 263 267 273 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 1,322
Write 663
Mixed 424
SusWrite 284
148% 673 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 49.9
4K Mixed 39.4
122% 39.7 MB/s
DQ Read 449
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 330
229% 296 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 121%
Great: 244%
SanDisk Ultra Plus 128GB-$75
18GB free
Firmware: X2316RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 64 64 59 57 64 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 424
Write 174
Mixed 147
SusWrite 65.7
44% 203 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 37.6
4K Mixed 21.1
75% 25.8 MB/s
DQ Read 305
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 98.2
106% 182 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 91%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
409GB free
Firmware: 8104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 40 39 40 39 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 26% Great: 79%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA332 1TB
239GB free, PID ce17
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 38 37 37 38 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Read 50.3
Write 36.4
Mixed 31.7
SusWrite 37.5
51% 39 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.9
69% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 12GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
53.5% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 15.8
53% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 16.2
46% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 81.7
49% 81.7 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 2 185 11 60 17.3" 1920 1032 LGD056D
Typical Predator PH317-52 Builds (Compare 1,553 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator PH317-52

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback