Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FJ_X509FJ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FJ_X509FJ  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X509FJ
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200430
Uptime12 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '24 at 06:16
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8265U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
33.6% Below average
Memory 33.2
1-Core 75.3
2-Core 129
43% 79.2 Pts
4-Core 202
8-Core 164
26% 183 Pts
64-Core 193
12% 193 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Asus(1043 11AF) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
3.59% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 3.6
Parallax 5.2
4% 4.47 fps
MRender 5.5
Gravity 7.8
Splatting 0.3
3% 4.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.59%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Optane+932GBHDD 1TB
792GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 16.8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 107 121 119 164 155 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
68.6% Good
Read 504
Write 69.5
Mixed 234
SusWrite 129
51% 234 MB/s
4K Read 46.9
4K Write 32.9
4K Mixed 19.9
114% 33.2 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 112
DQ Mixed 222
150% 184 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATS1G64HZ-2G3E1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile)
14% Very poor
MC Read 4.3
MC Write 5
MC Mixed 5.2
14% 4.83 GB/s
SC Read 3.5
SC Write 2.9
SC Mixed 2.6
9% 3 GB/s
Latency 173
23% 173 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 14%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 55 25 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO61ED
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FJ_X509FJ Builds (Compare 237 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FJ_X509FJ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $60
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback