Microelectronics G907

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 292%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 365%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics277% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive552% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
3 months ago, 1 month ago.
SystemMicroelectronics G907  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME X670E-PRO WIFI
Memory51.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230928
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '24 at 05:26
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D-$545
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 75.5
1-Core 190
2-Core 382
112% 216 Pts
4-Core 761
8-Core 1,425
130% 1,093 Pts
64-Core 3,141
194% 3,141 Pts
Poor: 114%
This bench: 109%
Great: 125%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7900-XTX-$1,000
ASRock(1849 5302) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 24GB, Driver: 24.1.1
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
277% Outstanding
Lighting 369
Reflection 463
Parallax 783
300% 538 fps
MRender 513
Gravity 329
Splatting 470
360% 437 fps
Poor: 216%
This bench: 277%
Great: 293%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN850X NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$146
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 620331WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3863 3834 3841 3924 3947 3995 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
552% Outstanding
Read 4,106
Write 4,032
Mixed 3,098
SusWrite 3,901
852% 3,784 MB/s
4K Read 58.6
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 68.8
243% 84.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,944
DQ Write 1,453
DQ Mixed 1635
1,239% 1,677 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 552%
Great: 685%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F5-5600J3636D322x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
180% Outstanding
MC Read 84.7
MC Write 55.9
MC Mixed 64.2
195% 68.3 GB/s
SC Read 40.5
SC Write 59.1
SC Mixed 46.2
139% 48.6 GB/s
Latency 87.6
46% 87.6 ns
Poor: 142%
This bench: 180%
Great: 218%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 48 12 120 44.8" 3440 1369 GSM9E8C LG ULTRAGEAR+
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback