Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 162%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 113%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 163%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 110%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics148% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive212% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230516
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '24 at 21:26
Run Duration224 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X-$219
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Memory 76.9
1-Core 211
2-Core 396
118% 228 Pts
4-Core 764
8-Core 1,161
119% 962 Pts
64-Core 1,761
109% 1,761 Pts
Poor: 97%
This bench: 110%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
148% Outstanding
Lighting 215
Reflection 263
Parallax 189
176% 223 fps
MRender 193
Gravity 152
Splatting 135
128% 160 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 148%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XPG SPECTRIX S40G 512GB
295GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VB411D45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1026 911 763 483 525 534 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
212% Outstanding
Read 1,431
Write 861
Mixed 941
SusWrite 707
220% 985 MB/s
4K Read 54.2
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 61.8
231% 82.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,219
DQ Write 609
DQ Mixed 1,172
801% 1,000 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 212%
Great: 309%
PNY SSD2SC120G1SA754D117-551 120GB
111GB free
Firmware: N1114B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 309 307 310 313 312 310 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
97.7% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 309
Mixed 301
SusWrite 310
80% 358 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 39.6
148% 57.1 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 297
DQ Mixed 186
168% 254 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 98%
Netac NVMe SSD 1TB
417GB free
Firmware: 3.S.J.11 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4359 2036 1135 1067 989 951 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
374% Outstanding
Read 2,293
Write 2808
Mixed 2,557
SusWrite 1,756
532% 2,354 MB/s
4K Read 53
4K Write 232
4K Mixed 88
316% 124 MB/s
DQ Read 1,904
DQ Write 1,586
DQ Mixed 1,728
1,299% 1,739 MB/s
Poor: 167%
This bench: 374%
Great: 520%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 154 158 156 159 157 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 131
Mixed 77.2
SusWrite 156
98% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AX5U6000C4016G-DCLAR 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
164% Outstanding
MC Read 56.9
MC Write 62.4
MC Mixed 59.2
170% 59.5 GB/s
SC Read 46.6
SC Write 63.3
SC Mixed 55.6
158% 55.2 GB/s
Latency 84.6
47% 84.6 ns
Poor: 135%
This bench: 164%
Great: 197%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 165 31.5" 1280 720 GSM7766 LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS Builds (Compare 113 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 412%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 418%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $2,175
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback