HP ProBook 440 14 inch G9 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics12.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive133% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP ProBook 440 14 inch G9 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8A9E
Memory6.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231019
Uptime1 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '24 at 15:33
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1235U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
63.4% Good
Memory 61.1
1-Core 157
2-Core 237
83% 152 Pts
4-Core 353
8-Core 573
57% 463 Pts
64-Core 678
42% 678 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
HP(103C 8A9E) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4887
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Lighting 14.1
Reflection 15.9
Parallax 16.9
12% 15.6 fps
MRender 14.3
Gravity 22.1
Splatting 13.5
13% 16.6 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL4512HBLU-00BH1 512GB
273GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS3NHAV
SusWrite @10s intervals: 732 830 575 314 253 245 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Read 1,073
Write 807
Mixed 791
SusWrite 491
177% 791 MB/s
4K Read 45.1
4K Write 60.9
4K Mixed 38.8
150% 48.3 MB/s
DQ Read 458
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 354
252% 330 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 133%
Great: 303%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP32D4S2S8MF-16 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.8% Below average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 13.9
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 13.3
36% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 134
30% 134 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 55 60 14" 1920 1057 AUO559C
Typical ProBook 440 14 inch G9 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 502 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 440 14 inch G9 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback