Lenovo 82MD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics9.33% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive57.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 82MD  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory0.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230612
Uptime3.7 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '24 at 11:49
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
11th Gen Intel Core i3-1115G4
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
44.3% Average
Memory 44.7
1-Core 89.4
2-Core 192
57% 109 Pts
4-Core 254
8-Core 252
34% 253 Pts
64-Core 256
16% 256 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Legend(17AA 3F9C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
9.33% Terrible
Lighting 10.5
Reflection 9.2
Parallax 12.3
9% 10.7 fps
MRender 11.3
Gravity 14.1
Splatting 13.9
11% 13.1 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 9.33%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme IM2P33F4 256GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B114215 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 40 213 93 81 74 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 766
Write 203
Mixed 68.5
SusWrite 112
62% 287 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 14.8
4K Mixed 5.3
49% 14.2 MB/s
DQ Read 268
DQ Write 15.3
DQ Mixed 22.4
46% 102 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 135%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HT Micron HTH5AN8G6NDJR-XND 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB Row of chips DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.4% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 10.9
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 12.3
SC Mixed 7.2
26% 9.03 GB/s
Latency 213
19% 213 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 6: 0P 0R 0G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
6% 40% 15 57 12 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO369F
Typical 82MD Builds (Compare 245 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82MD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback