Asus M11BB

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics38.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus M11BB  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M11BB
Memory8.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130807
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateFeb 06 '24 at 19:11
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-6500 APU-$135
FM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Memory 78.9
1-Core 67.3
2-Core 119
55% 88.4 Pts
4-Core 171
8-Core 181
23% 176 Pts
64-Core 179
11% 179 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Lighting 52.3
Reflection 39.9
Parallax 67
43% 53.1 fps
MRender 35.2
Gravity 55
Splatting 27.8
31% 39.3 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ AGILITY3 60GB
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.25
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 150
Write 64.6
Mixed 87.4
22% 101 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 50.2
4K Mixed 21
77% 28.9 MB/s
DQ Read 140
DQ Write 69.5
DQ Mixed 75.5
64% 94.9 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 51%
Hitachi HTS542516K9SA00 160GB-$298
100GB free
Firmware: BBCOC31P
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 51.6
Write 39.8
Mixed 24.8
29% 38.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
120% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 30%
MXT-USB Storage Device 32GB
29GB free, PID 8816
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 18.4
Write 13.3
Mixed 15
19% 15.6 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 2.7
203% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 M378B5773DH0-CH9 12GB
3200, 3200, 2666, 2666 MHz
4096, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.9% Poor
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 9.9
27% 9.5 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 10.3
24% 8.33 GB/s
Latency 84.8
47% 84.8 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 21.5" 1280 720 GSM5784 W2246
Typical M11BB Builds (Compare 240 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus M11BB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $158
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback