Biostar TA75M+

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardBiostar TA75M+  (all builds)
Memory7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120412
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 24 '20 at 21:40
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User DOM-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-3400 APU-$80
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
38.2% Below average
Memory 65.7
1-Core 41
2-Core 58.1
38% 54.9 Pts
4-Core 64.3
8-Core 72.7
9% 68.5 Pts
64-Core 77.9
5% 77.9 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6410D
Biostar(1565 1707) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.911.0.0
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
2.02% Terrible
Lighting 2.23
Reflection 3.73
Parallax 1.94
2% 2.63 fps
MRender 3.29
Gravity 1.63
Splatting 3.65
2% 2.86 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.02%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$80
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 63 71 76 75 61 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 86.5
Write 82.7
Mixed 46
SusWrite 62.2
51% 69.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 58%
Hitachi HDS725050KLA360 500GB-$40
22GB free
Firmware: K2AOAH0A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 47 44 49 49 48 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
21.6% Poor
Read 29.8
Write 27.8
Mixed 21.8
SusWrite 44.8
23% 31 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 34%
WD Blue 2.5" 250GB (2009)-$30
4GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 55 47 43 49 57 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
30.5% Below average
Read 59.5
Write 58.2
Mixed 37.3
SusWrite 46.7
37% 50.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
120% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 41%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
1GB free
Firmware: AM001J
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 87
Write 103
68% 95.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 21% Great: 60%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
3GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.8 8.2 9 9.1 9.2 8.8 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Read 24
Write 9
Mixed 1.8
SusWrite 8.3
12% 10.8 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1.9
127% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 M378B5773DH0-CH9 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.8% Poor
MC Read 9.9
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 10.4
28% 9.9 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 6.9
17% 5.87 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TA75M+ Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar TA75M+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $81
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback