Asus TUF Z390-PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics39.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z390-PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180921
Uptime1 Days
Run DateFeb 06 '24 at 00:40
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$252
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
55.3% Above average
Memory 54.1
1-Core 117
2-Core 242
72% 138 Pts
4-Core 303
8-Core 536
51% 420 Pts
64-Core 483
30% 483 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$407
MSI(1462 3722) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.65
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
39.2% Below average
Lighting 29.1
Reflection 46.1
Parallax 94.2
24% 56.5 fps
MRender 78.8
Gravity 105
Splatting 73.6
69% 85.8 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SHFR200960G 960GB
287GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 000056R8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 208 231 104 147 230 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
54.5% Above average
Read 359
Write 277
Mixed 254
SusWrite 192
60% 271 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 24.3
4K Mixed 19.7
66% 20.7 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 84.6
DQ Mixed 117
103% 159 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 101%
ST3000DM001-1CH166 500GB
202GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 217 242 258 251 294 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 327
Write 257
Mixed 228
SusWrite 252
60% 266 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 19.9
4K Mixed 19.4
66% 19.9 MB/s
DQ Read 298
DQ Write 78.2
DQ Mixed 145
118% 174 MB/s
Poor: 100% Great: 133%
WD WD2002FFSX-68PF8N0 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 81.00A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 172 175 175 180 182 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
Read 158
Write 180
Mixed 87.9
SusWrite 174
110% 150 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.9
183% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$75
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
52.3% Above average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 18.2
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 17.6
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 104
39% 104 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 19: 0P 2R 2G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
19% 28% 25 119 5 60 24" 1280 720 BNQ7F33 ZOWIE XL LCD
Typical TUF Z390-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 2,673 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z390-PRO GAMING - $275

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 117% - Outstanding Total price: $877
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback