Gigabyte GA-X670E AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 156%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 202%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 117%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics133% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive399% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X670E AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240130
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 04 '24 at 23:51
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X-$487
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Memory 77.4
1-Core 215
2-Core 427
123% 240 Pts
4-Core 831
8-Core 1,622
145% 1,226 Pts
64-Core 3,671
227% 3,671 Pts
Poor: 95%
This bench: 117%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Gigabyte(1458 4077) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Lighting 189
Reflection 227
Parallax 167
154% 194 fps
MRender 187
Gravity 136
Splatting 117
116% 147 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 133%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 1TB-$123
857GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QJXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4050 4027 3687 1649 1639 1654 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
399% Outstanding
Read 1,762
Write 4,291
Mixed 3,172
SusWrite 2,784
686% 3,002 MB/s
4K Read 56.3
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 80.8
264% 92.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,989
DQ Write 1,461
DQ Mixed 1,764
1,308% 1,738 MB/s
Poor: 275%
This bench: 399%
Great: 507%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
455GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,562
Write 2,346
Mixed 1643
485% 2,184 MB/s
4K Read 57.6
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 75.5
253% 87.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,868
DQ Write 1,680
DQ Mixed 1,774
1,330% 1,774 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
HP USB Flash Drive 64GB
32GB free, PID 2003
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 37
Write 11
Mixed 11.9
20% 20 MB/s
4K Read 8.4
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 2.7
194% 4.4 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT32GX5M2B6400C32 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
157% Outstanding
MC Read 62.8
MC Write 53.8
MC Mixed 53.4
162% 56.7 GB/s
SC Read 52.2
SC Write 57.1
SC Mixed 50.4
152% 53.2 GB/s
Latency 83.8
48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 138%
This bench: 157%
Great: 216%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 165 24" 1280 720 AUS24AC VG248
Typical GA-X670E AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 402%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 528%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X670E AORUS MASTER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $2,292
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback