Asus ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 191%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 190%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics197% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory25.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211102
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 04 '24 at 14:14
Run Duration244 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$399
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
Memory 93.5
1-Core 145
2-Core 291
97% 176 Pts
4-Core 558
8-Core 975
93% 766 Pts
64-Core 1,527
94% 1,527 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7800-XT
PowerColor(148C 2427) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 24.1.1
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
197% Outstanding
Lighting 253
Reflection 265
Parallax 466
206% 328 fps
MRender 331
Gravity 301
Splatting 285
248% 306 fps
Poor: 130%
This bench: 197%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,846
Write 1,133
Mixed 599
261% 1,193 MB/s
4K Read 44.4
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 44
179% 64.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,048
DQ Write 773
DQ Mixed 611
538% 810 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
HyperX Fury 240GB-$65
215GB free
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 143 145 146 139 143 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
69.7% Good
Read 310
Write 191
Mixed 239
SusWrite 144
49% 221 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 83.2
4K Mixed 37.2
131% 48.8 MB/s
DQ Read 158
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 181
134% 176 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 84%
Kingston SA2000M81000G 1TB
614GB free
Firmware: S5Z42109
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1020 534 475 478 476 480 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
221% Outstanding
Read 1737
Write 1600
Mixed 1,273
SusWrite 577
290% 1,297 MB/s
4K Read 53.6
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 72.1
238% 82.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,090
DQ Write 817
DQ Mixed 434
466% 780 MB/s
Poor: 140%
This bench: 221%
Great: 311%
Truenas iSCSI Disk 215GB
141GB free
Firmware: 0123
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 97 77 81 92 84 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
26.3% Poor
Read 86.8
Write 96.9
Mixed 99.4
SusWrite 88
21% 92.8 MB/s
4K Read 12.1
4K Write 11.8
4K Mixed 12.4
40% 12.1 MB/s
DQ Read 109
DQ Write 109
DQ Mixed 200
125% 139 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 42%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
901GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 176 167 181 180 183 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
99.9% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 96
Mixed 83
SusWrite 177
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
MC Read 36.1
MC Write 38.9
MC Mixed 28.9
99% 34.6 GB/s
SC Read 20.1
SC Write 42.9
SC Mixed 29.9
88% 31 GB/s
Latency 60
67% 60 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 51: 0P 5R 8G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
28% 55% 22 186 7 165 27" 2560 1377 HPN375B HP X27q
History: Score 28: 0P 2R 4G 6B | Score 51: 0P 5R 8G 2B
Typical ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING Builds (Compare 13,595 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 115%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING - $309

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $1,066
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback