Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	76% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	56.6% Above average	Memory 69.2 1-Core 63.7 2-Core 137 53% 89.9 Pts	4-Core 238 8-Core 414 40% 326 Pts	64-Core 417 26% 417 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 56.6% Great: 68%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
AMD 1X2 Mirror/RAID1 512GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 453GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.10 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	76% Very good	Read 501 Write 458 Mixed 602 117% 520 MB/s	4K Read 19.4 4K Write 46.1 4K Mixed 22.9 83% 29.5 MB/s	DQ Read 54 DQ Write 49 DQ Mixed 25.2 26% 42.7 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 76% Great: 76%
JetFlash Transcend 32GB 11,405 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 23GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	5.77% Terrible	Read 23.9 Write 5.95 Mixed 11.3 14% 13.7 MB/s	4K Read 4.19 4K Write 0.006 4K Mixed 0.002 16% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.77% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905471-030.A00LF 2x8GB 360 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	47.3% Average	MC Read 20.2 MC Write 14.7 MC Mixed 17.4 50% 17.4 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 13.9 31% 10.8 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 61%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	51x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	36x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	32x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	46x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	32x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples	26x

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $377