Dell Inspiron 16 5630

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics14.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemDell Inspiron 16 5630  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0DTVKW
Memory7.7 GB free of 16 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231218
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 02 '24 at 20:16
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1340P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
Memory 70.8
1-Core 187
2-Core 365
107% 207 Pts
4-Core 652
8-Core 718
90% 685 Pts
64-Core 940
58% 940 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Dell(1028 0C15) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4575
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Lighting 17.4
Reflection 23.7
Parallax 21.4
14% 20.8 fps
MRender 18.8
Gravity 22.9
Splatting 17
16% 19.6 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 23%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme 2550 Micron 1024GB
857GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 25500200 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,417
Write 1,838
Mixed 1440
351% 1,565 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 55.3
187% 66.1 MB/s
DQ Read 672
DQ Write 386
DQ Mixed 459
360% 506 MB/s
Poor: 161% Great: 343%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown H58G56BK7BX068 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h 8600 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (89th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
135% Outstanding
MC Read 52.4
MC Write 55.3
MC Mixed 49.1
149% 52.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 50
SC Mixed 22.4
84% 29.3 GB/s
Latency 99.7
40% 99.7 ns
Poor: 112%
This bench: 135%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 120 16" 1280 720 CSO161C
Typical Inspiron 16 5630 Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: Dell Inspiron 16 5630

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback