Asus Z97-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics118% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive47.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Z97-K  (all builds)
Memory23.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1824 x 1026 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140627
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 02 '24 at 16:25
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User LBN-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Memory 84.8
1-Core 101
2-Core 184
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 336
8-Core 502
52% 419 Pts
64-Core 505
31% 505 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
MSI(1462 C727) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.65
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
118% Outstanding
Lighting 153
Reflection 152
Parallax 150
125% 152 fps
MRender 188
Gravity 135
Splatting 117
117% 147 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 118%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 580ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 134 126 132 140 122 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 266
Write 139
Mixed 159
SusWrite 129
38% 173 MB/s
4K Read 11
4K Write 50.3
4K Mixed 22.9
73% 28.1 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 165
DQ Mixed 100
86% 126 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 142 141 138 143 141 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 55
Write 109
Mixed 74.8
SusWrite 140
70% 94.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.6
207% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.7 8 8.6 22 52 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
9.23% Terrible
Read 3.7
Write 11.5
Mixed 3.2
SusWrite 28.5
8% 11.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 9.23%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
610GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 100 94 102 99 102 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
55% Above average
Read 92.4
Write 100
Mixed 62
SusWrite 99.4
65% 88.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
47% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 55%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
6TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 169 168 169 166 168 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Read 105
Write 120
Mixed 78.1
SusWrite 167
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.7
241% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G KHX1866C10D3/8G KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1600C10D3/8G 32GB
1333, 1333, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52.4% Above average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 16.9
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 16.9
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 67.2
60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 41 7 60 40" 1280 720 SAM0B30 SAMSUNG
Typical Z97-K Builds (Compare 3,091 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-K - $147

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $795
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback