MSI MEG Z390 ACE (MS-7B12)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 294%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 270%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics328% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive94.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B12
MotherboardMSI MEG Z390 ACE (MS-7B12)  (all builds)
Memory20.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191230
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateFeb 02 '24 at 15:30
Run Duration227 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$262
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Memory 82.6
1-Core 141
2-Core 281
91% 168 Pts
4-Core 564
8-Core 965
93% 765 Pts
64-Core 940
58% 940 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,650
CLim: 3165 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 537.58
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
328% Outstanding
Lighting 484
Reflection 575
Parallax 747
395% 602 fps
MRender 530
Gravity 568
Splatting 300
364% 466 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 328%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
221GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 347 385 255 208 201 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Read 412
Write 398
Mixed 340
SusWrite 282
80% 358 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 78.8
4K Mixed 41.8
144% 51 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 353
266% 354 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 133%
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
234GB free
Firmware: CXB7401Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 469 309 226 123 119 125 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
169% Outstanding
Read 1,405
Write 1,031
Mixed 666
SusWrite 228
184% 833 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 83.1
4K Mixed 52.5
174% 59 MB/s
DQ Read 1,223
DQ Write 773
DQ Mixed 888
691% 961 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 169%
Great: 236%
Seagate FireCuda 520LE SSD ZP1000GM30012 1TB
195GB free
Firmware: STNSC016
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2137 2292 830 593 471 526 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
220% Outstanding
Read 1,235
Write 1,768
Mixed 1,474
SusWrite 1,141
318% 1,404 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 51
170% 62.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,364
DQ Write 820
DQ Mixed 1,139
836% 1108 MB/s
Poor: 158%
This bench: 220%
Great: 499%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
62GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 94 98 97 98 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
76.8% Very good
Read 171
Write 150
Mixed 85.8
SusWrite 96.6
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C15/8G KHX2400C15/8G KHX2666C15D4/8G KHX2666C15D4/8G 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
74.6% Very good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 23.8
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 29.4
SC Mixed 23.1
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 75.3
53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 53 60 27" 1280 720 ACR0490 XB271HU
Typical MEG Z390 ACE (MS-7B12) Builds (Compare 3,167 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG Z390 ACE (MS-7B12) - $243

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $1,317
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback