HP All-in-One Desktop 27-cr0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP All-in-One Desktop 27-cr0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8B4C
Memory0.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231102
Uptime4 Days
Run DateFeb 02 '24 at 14:25
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel N100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 0.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Memory 56.9
1-Core 99.5
2-Core 182
62% 113 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 313
42% 313 Pts
64-Core 251
16% 251 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
HP(103C 8B4C) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4953
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
2.99% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 6.2
Parallax 4.2
3% 4.7 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 2
Splatting 3.1
3% 3.7 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.99%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PSEDN128GA17DC0 128GB
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP000006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 137 225 171 136 156 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
70.2% Very good
Read 301
Write 166
Mixed 253
SusWrite 173
50% 223 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 76.5
4K Mixed 29.2
126% 45.9 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 146
DQ Mixed 191
148% 206 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 137%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-3G2R1 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
40.1% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 15.8
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 13.5
SC Mixed 6.1
28% 9.8 GB/s
Latency 142
28% 142 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 1 60 27" 1280 720 HPN4055 HP ALL-in-One
Typical All-in-One Desktop 27-cr0xxx Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: HP All-in-One Desktop 27-cr0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback