HP ProBook x360 11 G7 Education Edition

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProBook x360 11 G7 Education Edition  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 887D
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231013
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 02 '24 at 09:16
Run Duration95 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N5100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
44.5% Average
Memory 52.7
1-Core 71.5
2-Core 144
50% 89.3 Pts
4-Core 209
8-Core 217
28% 213 Pts
64-Core 223
14% 223 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
HP(103C 887D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1404
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
4.23% Terrible
Lighting 4.5
Reflection 5.4
Parallax 5
4% 4.97 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 4.5
Splatting 8
5% 6.3 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.23%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg40znv128g KIOXIA 128GB
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP00AE00
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 633
Write 606
Mixed 634
140% 624 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 47.6
4K Mixed 35.3
112% 36.8 MB/s
DQ Read 283
DQ Write 240
DQ Mixed 260
195% 261 MB/s
Poor: 57% Great: 202%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4U6E3S4AA-MGCR 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB Row of chips LPDDR4 4267 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.3% Below average
MC Read 11.8
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 12.9
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 11.6
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 156
26% 156 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 17: 0P 2R 1G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
17% 44% 16 77 57 60 11.6" 1280 720 BOE094B
Typical ProBook x360 11 G7 Education Edition Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook x360 11 G7 Education Edition

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback