HP ProBook x360 11 G7 Education Edition

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics5.07% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive47.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP ProBook x360 11 G7 Education Edition  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 887D
Memory0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221012
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 06 '23 at 11:38
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Silver N6000
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
29.5% Poor
Memory 30.3
1-Core 75.7
2-Core 128
42% 78.1 Pts
4-Core 167
8-Core 164
22% 165 Pts
64-Core 190
12% 190 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
HP(103C 887D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1404
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
5.07% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 4.1
Parallax 6.1
5% 5.37 fps
MRender 5.8
Gravity 6.6
Splatting 7.6
6% 6.67 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.07%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ssstc CL1-8D128-HP 128GB
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: L183
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 130 119 103 112 132 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
47.4% Average
Read 668
Write 197
Mixed 213
SusWrite 126
66% 301 MB/s
4K Read 8
4K Write 8.3
4K Mixed 7.9
27% 8.07 MB/s
DQ Read 190
DQ Write 24.7
DQ Mixed 191
118% 135 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 136%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4U6E3S4AA-MGCR 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB Row of chips LPDDR4 4267 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.8% Poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 10.5
MC Mixed 8.2
25% 8.73 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 6.5
18% 6.2 GB/s
Latency 253
16% 253 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProBook x360 11 G7 Education Edition Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook x360 11 G7 Education Edition

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback